![First page of this letter](/sites/default/files/styles/scaled_350/public/2024-08/ILRC%20Comments%20on%20SB%20602.png?itok=exp1YQ_p)
ILRC comments on Texas House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety Testimony on SB 602.
![First page of this resource](/sites/default/files/styles/scaled_350/public/2024-08/ILRC%20Comments%20on%20Recent%20Changes%20to%20Acquisition%20of%20Citizenship%20Changes%20in%20USCIS%20Policy%20Manual_Page_1.png?itok=Lp7684i7)
On August 12, ILRC provided feedback to USCIS on recent changes made to the acquisition of citizenship portion of the USCIS policy manual. ILRC commended the agency for providing clarity in some of the sections and provided suggested language that should be incorporated into the policy manual to ensure that all eligible applicants – including those who were previously denied and are now eligible due to changes to USCIS policy – are able to access the process now and obtain proof of their acquired citizenship.
![First page of the letter](/sites/default/files/styles/scaled_350/public/2024-08/ILRC%20Comments%20on%20Proposed%20Changes%20to%20T%20Visa%20Forms_Page_1.png?itok=2tQTCYW_)
On August 12, 2024, ILRC provided comments to USCIS on proposed changes to the application forms for T Nonimmigrant status. The comment urged USCIS to make additional changes to the form including removing the requirement for disclosure of juvenile adjudications and vacated criminal records and implementing uniform confidentiality and privacy language on the forms to ensure that the applicant’s sensitive information is protected.
Tags: U Visa/T Visa/VAWA
Tags: U Visa/T Visa/VAWA
![First page of this resource](/sites/default/files/styles/scaled_350/public/2024-07/ILRC%20Comment%20on%20Proposed%20Reg%20to%20Reschedule%20Marijuana%20to%20Schedule%20III_ILRC%20Letterhead%5B58%5D_Page_1.png?itok=HXxBGUEc)
On July 23, 2024, the ILRC provide comment on the Biden Administration’s proposed re-scheduling of marijuana. The ILRC advocated for the complete de-scheduling of marijuana instead of rescheduling. The comment highlighted the racist impacts of maintaining marijuana on the schedule of controlled substances and the lack of any mitigating effect that rescheduling will have on immigration consequences of marijuana-related crimes
![First page of this letter](/sites/default/files/styles/scaled_350/public/2024-07/ILRC%20comments%20on%20Form%20N-648%20with%20DREDF_Page_1.png?itok=ZybZtFZ8)
On July 15, 2024, the ILRC along with Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF) provided comment on Form N-648, Medical Certification for Disability Exceptions. ILRC and DREDF urged the agency to remove a question that conflates the disability exceptions for English and civics testing with waivers for the oath of allegiance.
![First page of this letter](/sites/default/files/styles/scaled_350/public/2024-07/ILRC%20Comment%20on%20changes%20to%20U%20Visa%20Forms_Page_1.png?itok=SVG41kKd)
On May 17, 2024, the ILRC provided comment to USCIS on proposed changes to the forms to apply for a U Visa. This is the second time that ILRC provided comment on proposed changes and USCIS accepted some of our previous comments in the newest version. We reiterated some previous requests in response to the agency’s changes and also requested that USCIS extend grace periods for the old forms to mitigate the harm to applicants who would have had to get new law enforcement certifications on new forms, which USCIS granted.
![First page of this letter](/sites/default/files/styles/scaled_350/public/2024-07/ILRC%20Comment%20on%20Temporary%20Final%20Rule%20Automatically%20Extending%20Employment%20Authorization%20Documents_Page_1.png?itok=Rr16ggTo)
On June 6, 2024, the ILRC submitted a comment in support of DHS’s temporary final rule (TFR) providing automatic extensions of employment authorization documents. The TFR specifically requested comment on whether the measure should be permanent and how long permanent automatic extensions should be. The ILRC wrote in support of a long and permanent auto-extension policy to ensure that applicants are not harmed by administrative delays that lead to lapses in document validity.
![First page of the resource](/sites/default/files/styles/scaled_350/public/2024-07/1721155914118-696f15cd-4a43-4bb7-83c6-c7b595d5e550_1.jpg?itok=zDW19KN5)
On July 8, the ILRC submitted a comment opposing the Biden administration’s interim final rule (IFR) entitled “Securing the Border.” The IFR unlawfully restricts asylum access by restricting entry and creating a bar to asylum eligibility when there have been a certain number of encounters at the southern U.S. border.
![First page of resource](/sites/default/files/styles/scaled_350/public/2024-06/ILRC%20Comment%20on%20NPRM%20Application%20of%20Certain%20Mandatory%20Bars%20in%20Fear%20Screenings_Page_01.png?itok=LrCorcjI)
On June 12, the ILRC submitted a comment opposing the Biden administration’s proposed rule that seeks to apply certain mandatory bars to asylum at the fear screening stage. The proposed rule contradicts the administration’s previous finding that such a policy would be inconsistent with statutory intent. It would also deprive asylum seekers of an opportunity to access asylum procedures by adding legally complex bars to the threshold screening for eligibility.